@article{TAU15309,
author = {Timothy K. O’Rourke Jr and Alexander Erbella and Yu Zhang and Matthew S. Wosnitzer},
title = {Prevention, identification, and management of post-operative penile implant complications of infection, hematoma, and device malfunction},
journal = {Translational Andrology and Urology},
volume = {6},
number = {Suppl 5},
year = {2017},
keywords = {},
abstract = {Penile prosthesis implant surgery is an effective management approach for a number of urological conditions, including medication refractory erectile dysfunction (ED). Complications encountered post-operatively include infection, bleeding/hematoma, and device malfunction. Since the 1970s, modifications to these devices have reduced complication rates through improvement in antisepsis and design using antibiotic coatings, kink-resistant tubing, lock-out valves to prevent autoinflation, and modified reservoir shapes. Device survival and complication rates have been investigated predominately by retrospective database-derived studies. This review article focuses on the identification and management of post-operative complications following penile prosthetic and implant surgery. Etiology for ED, surgical technique, and prosthesis type are variable among studies. The most common post-operative complications of infection, bleeding, and device malfunction may be minimized by adherence to consistent technique and standard protocol. Novel antibiotic coatings and standard antibiotic regimen may reduce infection rates. Meticulous hemostasis and intraoperative testing of devices may further reduce need for revision surgery. Additional prospective studies with consistent reporting of outcomes and comparison of surgical approach and prosthesis type in patients with variable ED etiology would be beneficial.},
issn = {2223-4691}, url = {https://tau.amegroups.org/article/view/15309}
}