A novel nomogram to predict testicular torsion in children with acute scrotal pain: a single-center retrospective study in western China
Highlight box
Key findings
• In this study, a nomogram for predicting testicular torsion (TT) was constructed using multivariate logistic regression analysis, and its accuracy and reliability were evaluated using a validation set. The results show that the established prediction model can effectively assist pediatric surgeons in diagnosis and treatment.
What is known and what is new?
• Acute scrotal pain (ASP) is the most common emergency in pediatric urology. At present, there are a number of clinical studies on the occurrence of TT in children with ASP. However, there are limitations such as low accuracy and incomplete inclusion factors.
• This study is the first to combine the clinical information, physical examination, laboratory examination and imaging findings of patients to construct a prediction model. It is the largest study of TT in children in the southwest.
What is the implication, and what should change now?
• It is time to change the approach to diagnosis and treatment of ASP in children by adopting the nomogram predictive model for risk assessment and considering the risk of surgical exploration and the risk of potential testicular atrophy.
Introduction
Background
Acute scrotal pain (ASP) refers to testicular pain with or without swelling and is the most common urological emergency in pediatric patients (1). The etiology of ASP varies in different reports, mainly including testicular torsion (TT), torsion of the testicular appendage, and epididymal-orchitis (2). In a study of 238 children with ASP, the incidence rates of TT, torsion of the testicular appendage, and epididymitis were 16%, 46%, and 35%, respectively (3). TT, also known as spermatic cord torsion, refers to the vascular compromise of the testicle, epididymis, and other structures due to torsion, resulting in sudden scrotal pain as the main symptom. It requires timely and accurate diagnosis as emergency surgical exploration is the only way to prevent testicular loss (4). However, conservative antimicrobial therapy is the recommended treatment for epididymal orchitis, and surgery is only considered when scrotal abscess formation and septicemia occur (5). Similarly, once torsion of the testicular appendage is confirmed, it can be managed with conservative anti-infection administration and sufficient analgesics without surgical intervention (6). The disease can heal itself or causes only mild epididymitis with no obvious adverse consequences during conservative treatment because it is self-limiting and testicular appendage has no physiological function. When it causes epididymitis, anti-infective treatment is needed at the same time. Therefore, improving the recognition of TT by primary care physicians, early diagnosis, and timely surgical exploration are crucial for improving testicular survival rates.
Studies have shown that surgical exploration is one of the significant risk factors affecting testicular function (7). Therefore, surgical exploration is not recommended if TT is not present due to the potential risk of testicular atrophy (8). Moreover, surgery significantly increases the incidence of scrotal infection and hematoma (1).
The diagnosis of TT requires a comprehensive assessment based on the patient’s medical history, physical examination, and color Doppler ultrasonography (CDU) findings. However, TT still has a high misdiagnosis rate. After being misdiagnosed as orchitis or testicular appendage torsion, conservative observation is used, which delays the timing of surgery and leads to a high rate of testicular loss. A recent analysis of 301 TT patients from a medical center in China found that only a quarter of patients were accurately diagnosed and received timely treatment at the initial visit (9). TT is often misdiagnosed as epididymal-orchitis or torsion of the testicular appendage, mainly due to an inadequate understanding of the disease, overreliance on a single ultrasound result, and insufficient history inquiry and detailed physical examination (10).
A nomogram is constructed based on multivariable regression analysis. It integrates multiple predictive indicators through regression analysis and uses scaled lines to express the relationships among variables in the predictive model. It has been widely used in clinical outcome prediction for various malignant solid tumors and has shown good predictive performance (11-13). However, there is limited research on predictive models for TT. Takeshita et al. developed a nomogram to predict TT in Japanese patients with ASP based on physical examination and environmental factors (14). Still, they overlooked the role of important ancillary tests such as CDU in diagnosing TT. Chen and other researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of TT patients over 12 years in a single center, constructing a predictive model based on hematological indicators such as white blood cells, lymphocytes, and monocytes (15). However, this predictive model focused solely on hematological indicators, which may introduce certain biases in the results. Therefore, it is crucial to establish and construct a highly accurate nomogram in identifying TT and predicting the probability of TT in children with ASP.
This study included pediatric patients who visited Kunming Children’s Hospital between 2014 and 2022 and underwent surgical exploration for ASP. Collecting data on patient’s physical examinations, general conditions, laboratory tests, and imaging results, we conducted a comprehensive analysis with a large sample size and multiple factors. We constructed a nomogram and performed external validation to provide reference and guidance for clinical decision-making by healthcare professionals. This manuscript is written following TRIPOD reporting checklist (available at https://tau.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tau-23-634/rc).
Methods
Patient collection and screening
We collected data from all pediatric patients who underwent ASP management at our hospital between 2014 and 2022. This is a retrospective case study. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kunming Children’s Hospital (No. 2023-03-101-K01). Our study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). Furthermore, this study is retrospective and did not use identifiable information from the patients. Therefore, informed consent from the parents/guardians of children was not required.
All pediatric patients who underwent surgical exploration for ASP were included in this study. Inclusion criteria were: (I) age <18 years; (II) diagnosis between 2014 and 2022; (III) admission diagnosis of ASP. Exclusion criteria were: (I) age less than 6 months; (II) patients who did not undergo surgery. Cases with missing data were eliminated. The flow chart of this study is shown in Figure 1.
Definition of variables
The variables included in this study comprised general patient characteristics (age, ethnicity, place of residence, laterality, triggering factors, presence of nausea/vomiting, duration of symptoms), physical examination findings (thickening of the spermatic cord, presence of cremasteric reflex, high-positioned testis, testicular swelling, hardening of the testis, tenderness on elevation), laboratory test results (blood routine parameters including neutrophils, lymphocytes, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelets, platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocytes, eosinophils, monocyte-eosinophil ratio (MER), mean platelet volume (MPV), basophils, C-reactive protein; routine urine parameters including leukocytes, red blood cells), and CDU findings (epididymal size, echogenicity, and blood flow signals, testicular parenchymal echo texture, testicular blood flow signals, scrotal wall edema, testicular microlithiasis). The outcomes for the children were categorized as surgical confirmation of TT or no torsion of the testis.
Development and validation of the nomogram
All patients were divided into training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. In the training set, we first analyzed univariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with TT. It was determined that there were no differences in settings, eligibility criteria, outcomes, and predictors between the training and validation sets. Factors with a P value less than 0.05 were then included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis to obtain independent risk factors for TT in pediatric patients with ASP. Based on these risk factors, we used R software and the logistic regression function to construct a predictive model for TT in ASP patients. Subsequently, we validated the accuracy and reliability of the nomogram using calibration curves, the concordance index, and the area under the curve (AUC). Additionally, we compared the clinical performance of the nomogram with the Testicular Workup for Ischemia and Suspected Torsion (TWIST) score using the AUC and C-index.
Statistical analysis
Categorical variables were described using frequencies, and group differences were assessed using Chi-squared tests. The continuous variables were tested for normal distribution. The measurement data conforming to normal distribution were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (s.d.), and the t-test was used for comparison between groups. Non-parametric U tests were used for those that did not satisfy a normal distribution. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with TT in pediatric patients. All analyses were conducted using SPSS, version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and R statistical software (version 4.1.0; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
General patient characteristics
A total of 283 patients were included in this study, of which 134 patients experienced TT. The mean age of all patients was 105±47.9 months, and most were of Han ethnicity (87.6%) and resided in urban areas (83%). Most patients had C-reactive protein levels between 1–10 µg/mL, and most had negative leukocyte findings in routine urine tests (63.3%). The variables of all patients are presented in Table 1, with no significant differences observed between the training and validation sets.
Table 1
Factors | All (N=283) | Training cohort (N=194) | Validation cohort (N=89) | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
Location | >0.99 | |||
Urban | 235 (83.0) | 161 (83.0) | 74 (83.1) | |
Rural | 48 (17.0) | 33 (17.0) | 15 (16.9) | |
Race | 0.84 | |||
Han nationality | 248 (87.6) | 169 (87.1) | 79 (88.8) | |
Ethnic minorities | 35 (12.4) | 25 (12.9) | 10 (11.2) | |
Age (months) | 105 (47.9) | 109 (48.3) | 96.6 (46.2) | 0.047 |
Laterality | 0.50 | |||
Left | 165 (58.3) | 110 (56.7) | 55 (61.8) | |
Right | 118 (41.7) | 84 (43.3) | 34 (38.2) | |
Precipitating factor | 0.40 | |||
Conscious and no obvious trigger | 213 (75.3) | 143 (73.7) | 70 (78.7) | |
Sleep | 54 (19.1) | 41 (21.1) | 13 (14.6) | |
After trauma or exercise | 16 (5.6) | 10 (5.2) | 6 (6.7) | |
Neutrophils (109/L) | 5.67 (2.82) | 5.78 (3.05) | 5.43 (2.24) | 0.28 |
Lymphocytes (109/L) | 2.98 (1.68) | 2.99 (1.72) | 2.94 (1.60) | 0.80 |
NLR | 2.70 (2.66) | 2.85 (2.96) | 2.37 (1.81) | 0.10 |
Platelet (109/L) | 319 (86.8) | 319 (80.8) | 319 (99.3) | 0.99 |
PLR | 134 (76.3) | 136 (81.2) | 129 (64.6) | 0.41 |
Monocytes (109/L) | 0.51 (0.28) | 0.51 (0.27) | 0.51 (0.29) | 0.96 |
Eosinophils (109/L) | 0.14 (0.15) | 0.13 (0.13) | 0.16 (0.17) | 0.12 |
MER | 16.0 (27.0) | 17.3 (28.5) | 13.0 (23.3) | 0.18 |
MPV (fL) | 9.64 (0.94) | 9.57 (0.88) | 9.80 (1.04) | 0.07 |
Basophils (109/L) | 0.02 (0.02) | 0.02 (0.02) | 0.02 (0.02) | 0.78 |
C reactive protein (mg/L) | 0.51 | |||
≤10 | 273 (96.5) | 188 (96.9) | 85 (95.5) | |
>10 | 10 (3.5) | 6 (3.1) | 4 (4.5) | |
Urine routine white blood cells | 0.26 | |||
Positive | 32 (11.3) | 26 (13.4) | 6 (6.7) | |
Negative | 179 (63.3) | 120 (61.9) | 59 (66.3) | |
Unknown | 72 (25.4) | 48 (24.7) | 24 (27.0) | |
Urinalysis red blood cells | 0.65 | |||
Positive | 22 (7.77) | 17 (8.76) | 5 (5.62) | |
Negative | 188 (66.4) | 128 (66.0) | 60 (67.4) | |
Unknown | 73 (25.8) | 49 (25.3) | 24 (27.0) | |
Epididymal size | 0.85 | |||
Enlargement | 160 (56.5) | 108 (55.7) | 52 (58.4) | |
Normal | 70 (24.7) | 48 (24.7) | 22 (24.7) | |
Unclear results | 53 (18.7) | 38 (19.6) | 15 (16.9) | |
Echogenicity of epididymal parenchyma | 0.60 | |||
Heterogeneous | 125 (44.2) | 82 (42.3) | 43 (48.3) | |
Uniform | 103 (36.4) | 72 (37.1) | 31 (34.8) | |
Unclear results | 55 (19.4) | 40 (20.6) | 15 (16.9) | |
Epididymal blood flow | 0.77 | |||
Abundant | 66 (23.3) | 45 (23.2) | 21 (23.6) | |
Normal | 104 (36.7) | 69 (35.6) | 35 (39.3) | |
Absent or loss | 55 (19.4) | 37 (19.1) | 18 (20.2) | |
Disappear or not clear | 58 (20.5) | 43 (22.2) | 15 (16.9) | |
Testicular parenchymal echo | 0.15 | |||
Heterogeneous | 123 (43.5) | 86 (44.3) | 37 (41.6) | |
Uniform | 153 (54.1) | 101 (52.1) | 52 (58.4) | |
Unclear results | 7 (2.47) | 7 (3.61) | 0 | |
Testicular blood flow | 0.23 | |||
Abundant | 24 (8.48) | 17 (8.76) | 7 (7.87) | |
Normal | 145 (51.2) | 94 (48.5) | 51 (57.3) | |
Absent or loss | 107 (37.8) | 76 (39.2) | 31 (34.8) | |
Disappear or not clear | 7 (2.47) | 7 (3.61) | 0 | |
Scrotal edema | 0.91 | |||
Yes | 60 (21.2) | 42 (21.6) | 18 (20.2) | |
No/unknown | 223 (78.8) | 152 (78.4) | 71 (79.8) | |
Spermatic cord | 0.54 | |||
Torsion or enlarged | 25 (8.83) | 19 (9.79) | 6 (6.7) | |
Normal | 258 (91.2) | 175 (90.2) | 83 (93.3) | |
Testicular microlithiasis | 0.45 | |||
Yes | 19 (6.71) | 15 (7.73) | 4 (4.5) | |
No | 264 (93.3) | 179 (92.3) | 85 (95.5) | |
Lifting pain | 0.33 | |||
Yes | 35 (12.4) | 21 (10.8) | 14 (15.7) | |
No/unknown | 248 (87.6) | 173 (89.2) | 75 (84.3) | |
Cremasteric reflex | 0.92 | |||
Disappear | 37 (13.1) | 26 (13.4) | 11 (12.4) | |
Exist | 29 (10.2) | 19 (9.79) | 10 (11.2) | |
Unclear | 217 (76.7) | 149 (76.8) | 68 (76.4) | |
Testicular sclerosis | 0.76 | |||
Yes | 123 (43.5) | 86 (44.3) | 37 (41.6) | |
No | 160 (56.5) | 108 (55.7) | 52 (58.4) | |
Testicular swelling | 0.50 | |||
Yes | 105 (37.1) | 75 (38.7) | 30 (33.7) | |
No | 178 (62.9) | 119 (61.3) | 59 (66.3) | |
High testicular position | 0.55 | |||
Yes | 20 (7.07) | 12 (6.19) | 8 (8.99) | |
No | 263 (92.9) | 182 (93.8) | 81 (91.0) | |
Nausea vomiting | >0.99 | |||
Yes | 18 (6.36) | 12 (6.19) | 6 (6.74) | |
No | 265 (93.6) | 182 (93.8) | 83 (93.3) | |
Duration of symptoms (hours) | 49.8 (55.4) | 47.9 (51.4) | 54.1 (63.4) | 0.42 |
Data are presented as n (%) and means (standard deviations). NLR, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet-lymphocyte ratio; MER, monocyte-eosinophil ratio; MPV, mean platelet volume.
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis
We first conducted a univariate logistic regression analysis, which revealed that laterality, neutrophils, NLR, PLR, monocytes, eosinophils, MER, basophils, epididymal enlargement, epididymal parenchymal echo texture, epididymal blood flow, testicular parenchymal echo texture, testicular blood flow signals, thickening of the spermatic cord, tenderness on elevation, presence of cremasteric reflex, testicular microlithiasis, testicular swelling, and high-positioned testis were factors affecting the occurrence of TT in patients with ASP. Subsequently, these risk factors were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis, which revealed that laterality, neutrophils, MER, epididymal blood flow signals, testicular parenchymal echo texture, and testicular blood flow signals were independent risk factors influencing the occurrence of TT in pediatric patients with ASP (Table 2).
Table 2
Factors | Univariate | Multivariate | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR | 95% CI | P | HR | 95% CI | P | ||
Location | |||||||
Urban | Reference | ||||||
Rural | 2.010 | 0.930–4.350 | 0.08 | – | – | – | |
Race | |||||||
Han nationality | Reference | ||||||
Ethnic minorities | 1.350 | 0.580–3.140 | 0.49 | – | – | – | |
Age | 1.010 | 1.000–1.010 | 0.09 | – | – | – | |
Laterality | |||||||
Left | Reference | ||||||
Right | 0.370 | 0.210–0.670 | 0.001 | 23.061 | 4.184–127.115 | 0.001 | |
Precipitating factor | |||||||
Conscious and no obvious trigger | Reference | ||||||
Sleep | 0.690 | 0.340–1.390 | 0.30 | – | – | – | |
After trauma or exercise | 0.220 | 0.050–1.070 | 0.06 | – | – | – | |
Neutrophils | 1.550 | 1.330–1.800 | 0.001 | 0.702 | 0.558–0.882 | 0.002 | |
Lymphocytes | 0.860 | 0.720–1.020 | 0.08 | – | – | – | |
NLR | 1.780 | 1.410–2.250 | 0.001 | – | – | – | |
Platelet | 1.000 | 1.000–1.000 | 0.76 | – | – | – | |
PLR | 1.010 | 1.000–1.020 | 0.001 | – | – | – | |
Monocytes | 6.360 | 1.960–20.630 | 0.001 | – | – | – | |
Eosinophils | 0.020 | 0–0.260 | 0.001 | – | – | – | |
MER | 1.050 | 1.020–1.080 | 0.001 | 0.976 | 0.947–1.005 | 0.01 | |
MPV | 0.990 | 0.720–1.360 | 0.93 | – | – | – | |
Basophils | 0 | 0–0.250 | 0.03 | – | – | – | |
C reactive protein, mg/L | |||||||
≤10 | Reference | ||||||
>10 | 17,042,592.860 | 0–Inf | 0.99 | – | – | – | |
Urine routine white blood cells | |||||||
Positive | Reference | ||||||
Negative | 0.780 | 0.330–1.810 | 0.56 | – | – | – | |
Unknown | 0.930 | 0.360–2.430 | 0.88 | – | – | – | |
Urinalysis red blood cells | |||||||
Positive | Reference | ||||||
Negative | 0.810 | 0.290–2.230 | 0.68 | – | – | – | |
Unknown | 1.000 | 0.330–3.030 | 0.99 | – | – | – | |
Epididymal size | |||||||
Enlargement | Reference | ||||||
Normal | 0.710 | 0.350–1.440 | 0.34 | – | – | – | |
Unclear results | 6.920 | 2.670–17.920 | 0.001 | – | – | – | |
Echogenicity of epididymal parenchyma | |||||||
Heterogeneous | Reference | ||||||
Uniform | 0.530 | 0.270–1.010 | 0.050 | – | – | – | |
Unclear results | 4.200 | 1.730–10.200 | 0.001 | – | – | – | |
Epididymal blood flow | |||||||
Abundant | Reference | ||||||
Normal | 0.890 | 0.360–2.230 | 0.80 | 0.395 | 0.080–1.950 | 0.25 | |
Absent or loss | 126.000 | 15.310–1,036.840 | 0.001 | 23.500 | 2.100–265.500 | 0.003 | |
Disappear or not clear | 18.000 | 6.160–52.590 | 0.001 | 4.010 | 1.050–44.100 | 0.001 | |
Testicular parenchymal echo | |||||||
Uniform | Reference | ||||||
Heterogeneous | 0.06 | 0.030–0.120 | 0.001 | 9.166 | 2.681–31.339 | 0.001 | |
Unclear results | 1.370 | 0.150–12.200 | 0.78 | 4.412 | 0.120–162.295 | 0.42 | |
Testicular blood flow | |||||||
Abundant | Reference | ||||||
Normal | 1.420 | 0.290–6.880 | 0.66 | 0.055 | 0.006–0.53 | 0.01 | |
Absent or loss | 182.500 | 28.003–1,188.040 | 0.001 | 2.154 | 0.255–18.183 | 0.48 | |
Disappear or not clear | 45.000 | 3.410–594.140 | 0.001 | 1.254 | 1.102–2.785 | 0.004 | |
Scrotal edema | |||||||
Yes | Reference | ||||||
No/unknown | 1.100 | 0.560–2.180 | 0.78 | – | – | – | |
Spermatic cord | |||||||
Torsion or enlarged | Reference | ||||||
Normal | 0.160 | 0.040–0.560 | 0.001 | – | – | – | |
Testicular microlithiasis | |||||||
Yes | Reference | ||||||
No | 2.070 | 0.680–6.290 | 0.20 | – | – | – | |
Lifting pain | |||||||
Yes | Reference | ||||||
No/unknown | 3.550 | 1.250–10.120 | 0.02 | – | – | – | |
Cremasteric reflex | |||||||
Disappear | Reference | ||||||
Exist | 0.010 | 0–0.100 | 0.001 | – | – | – | |
Unclear | 0.170 | 0.060–0.530 | 0.001 | – | – | – | |
Testicular sclerosis | |||||||
Yes | Reference | ||||||
No | 0.070 | 0.040–0.150 | 0.001 | – | – | – | |
Testicular swelling | |||||||
Yes | Reference | ||||||
No | 0.140 | 0.070–0.270 | 0.001 | – | – | – | |
High testicular position | |||||||
Yes | Reference | ||||||
No | 0.180 | 0.040–0.840 | 0.03 | – | – | – | |
Nausea vomiting | |||||||
Yes | Reference | ||||||
No | 0 | 0–Inf | 0.99 | – | – | – |
HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; NLR, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet-lymphocyte ratio; MER, monocyte-eosinophil ratio; MPV, mean platelet volume; Inf, infinity.
Development of the nomogram for predicting TT
Based on the independent risk factors selected through multivariate logistic regression analysis, we developed a nomogram to predict the probability of TT in pediatric patients with ASP. We found that side, neutrophil count, MER, epididymal blood flow signal on ultrasound, testicular parenchyma echo, and testicular blood flow signal were independent risk factors for predicting TT in children with scrotal emergency, and were included in the construction of the final prediction model. As shown in Figure 2, patients with left-sided occurrence had a higher probability of TT, and those with weakened or absent epididymal blood flow signals, uneven testicular parenchymal echo texture, and weakened or absent testicular blood flow signals had a higher risk of TT.
Validation of the nomogram
We employed a series of validation methods to assess the accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram. The concordance index (C-index) results showed that the nomogram had a C-index of 0.981 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.965–0.996] in the training set and 0.985 (95% CI: 0.962–0.997) in the validation set, indicating good discriminative ability. The AUC values for the training and validation sets also demonstrated the strong discriminative power of the nomogram (Figure 3). Furthermore, calibration curves were used to assess the accuracy of the model, and the results showed a high level of consistency between the predicted and actual values in both the training and validation sets, confirming the model’s accuracy (Figure 4). We also plotted the AUC curves for the five factors related to the TWIST score (Figure S1). The C-index of the TWIST score was 0.878 (95% CI: 0.837–0.920) in the training set and 0.855 (95% CI: 0.802–0.908) in the validation set.
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) analysis
The establishment of predictive models is of great strategic significance in the selection of treatment options for children with acute scrotum. Through SWOT analysis, we will evaluate the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of the program.
Strengths: (I) technical expertise—the team has leading data analysis technology, which provides a solid foundation for the accuracy of the prediction model. (II) Innovation ability—continue to pay attention to the trends of medical research to ensure that the prediction model always stays in the leading position. (III) Industry experience—the team has rich experience in the medical industry, and can accurately grasp the market demand and competition situation.
Weaknesses: (I) data resource limitation—limited data sources may limit the training and prediction effect of the model. (II) High cost—data collection and processing require a large amount of resources. (III) Market awareness—the market awareness of the new model needs to be improved, and the marketing efforts need to be intensified.
Opportunities: (I) market demand growth—the public’s attention to children’s health issues has increased, and the market demand shows an increasing trend. (II) Technological progress—technological development provides possibilities for the improvement of model accuracy. (III) Policy support—may obtain policy support from the government or relevant institutions to promote the development of the project.
Threats: (I) competitors—other medical institutions may develop similar predictive models and become strong competitors. (II) Regulatory risk—regulatory changes may affect project implementation and promotion. (III) Technical risk—the emergence of new technologies may bring uncertainty, which may affect the stability and reliability of the model.
Discussion
Men of all ages may develop TT, but it is most common in children. The incidence of TT in men under 25 years old is about 1/4,000, and the incidence of left side is higher than that of right side (16). Long or absent gubernaculum testis, high connection point between parietal layer of tunica vaginalis of testis and spermatic cord, resulting in “pendulum-like malformation”, cryptorchidism and other congenital dysplasia or malformations are risk factors for TT (17). Exercise and trauma may cause testicular compression or collision, excessive activity of the cremaster muscle induces torsion, vagus nerve excitation during sleep, and contraction or spasm of the cremaster muscle may induce TT (18).
This study retrospectively analyzed 283 cases of ASP in pediatric patients who underwent emergency exploratory surgery at our medical center. A nomogram was constructed to predict the probability of TT in ASP patients. It was found that left-sided occurrence decreased neutrophil count, decreased ratio of monocytes to eosinophils, heterogeneous testicular parenchymal echoes indicated by preoperative color flow Doppler (CFD) ultrasound examination, and weakened or absent blood flow signals in the testicles and epididymis were independent risk factors for predicting TT in ASP patients. Based on these factors, a nomogram was developed and validated using an internal and external validation set, confirming the model’s good predictive performance.
Laterality has been considered important in predicting TT. Rub et al., through a study on the relationship between seasonal variation and TT, found that the occurrence of TT is closely associated with lower environmental temperatures (<15 ℃), and left-sided torsion is more predominant in both children and adolescents (19). Marulaiah et al., through a 12-year retrospective analysis at a single center, found that TT and testicular atrophy resulting from TT occurred more frequently on the left side (20). Similarly, Tanaka et al., by collecting clinical information from 165 pediatric ASP patients at a single center, identified left-sided laterality as an independent risk factor for TT in ASP patients (21). Chang et al. also concluded that left-sided ASP is more likely to induce TT (22). Consistent with previous reports, this study found that left-sided ASP is more likely to lead to TT.
In recent years, hematological indicators have gradually become an important reference factor for diagnosing various diseases due to their reliable results, easy accessibility, and low-cost advantages. TT is no exception (15). In 2019, Yucel and other researchers conducted a retrospective multicenter study to clarify the application of hematological indicators in the differential diagnosis of TT and epididymal-orchitis. They found that compared to the normal control group, patients with ASP had significantly elevated neutrophil count, platelet count, leukocyte count, NLR, MER, and PLR values. Importantly, the predictive value of NLR for predicting TT reached a level similar to CDU (23). Yilmaz and others found through multivariate logistic regression analysis that monocyte count was the only factor significantly different between the TT and ASP groups (24). This study’s smaller MER value indicated a higher likelihood of TT diagnosis. In addition, lower neutrophil count was associated with TT. This may be due to the fact that epididymo-orchitis is usually accompanied by a systemic inflammatory response such as fever, which in children with TT is usually not manifested or appears at an advanced stage of the disease. Interestingly, there are significant differences in the results reported by the existing studies of hematological indicators. This may be related to the limited reports of relevant studies and the insufficient sample size of included patients. At the same time, there is a lack of relevant research reports on children (25).
CFD ultrasound has been recommended as the preferred examination for ASP due to its convenience, low cost, and high accuracy. Among them, high-frequency ultrasound is still the preferred imaging method, providing excellent sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing TT, epididymal-orchitis, and testicular appendage torsion (26). CDU can rapidly evaluate potential urogenital emergencies. Although grayscale imaging is helpful, CFD ultrasound is the preferred examination for imaging the scrotum and testicles (27). However, the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and the subjective judgment of the examiner are closely related. In a retrospective study of ultrasound examination results in 215 patients with ASP, Hendrikx and others found a misdiagnosis rate of 2.33% (5/215) among ultrasound specialists (28). A meta-analysis involving 2,116 patients showed an overall sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 95% for CFD ultrasound in diagnosing TT (29). Studies have shown that the echo and blood flow signals of the testicles and epididymis are important factors in the initial diagnosis of TT (9,10,15). However, some researchers have reported different views. Tian and others found that although testicular blood flow signals have high sensitivity and specificity for imaging the affected testicle, they are not related to the prognosis of TT. However, the uneven echo of the testicular parenchyma should be taken seriously because it is a sign of persistent ischemia or necrosis of the testicular parenchyma tissue (30). This study found that the blood flow signals of the epididymis and testicles and the echo of the testicular parenchyma have good predictive value for the diagnosis of TT. Uneven echo of the testicular parenchyma and reduced or absent blood flow signals in the epididymis and testicles indicate a high possibility of TT, and active surgical exploration should be considered.
The TWIST score is a 7-point tool to assess ASP. The parameters include testicular swelling, hard testicle, high-riding testicle, absent cremasteric reflex, and nausea/vomiting. It is considered an important basis for clinicians to make initial judgments of TT during physical examination of pediatric patients before completing hematological and imaging examinations such as CFD ultrasound. It can effectively reduce reliance on examination and test results (31). Sheth and other researchers also found that low-risk patients under the TWIST score do not require an ultrasound to rule out torsion. High-risk patients can proceed directly to surgery, avoiding ultrasound examinations in over 50% of patients (32). However, Feng and others analyzed clinical presentations, physical examination, laboratory data, and CDU findings in 136 patients. They found that physical examination results are not risk factors for TT (17). Hisamatsu et al. also confirmed that although the TWIST score can diagnose TT, its clinical value is lower than ultrasound (33). This study found, through univariate logistic regression of the included factors, that apart from nausea/vomiting, the other four indicators in the TWIST score (increased reflex, testicular swelling, hard testicle, and high-riding testicle) are all associated factors in predicting TT. However, unfortunately, after balancing the interactions between multiple factors, none of the TWIST-related indicators were included as independent risk factors for predicting TT occurrence in the multivariate logistic regression. The AUC curve and C-index were significantly lower than those of the predictive model we constructed. This indicates that our nomogram has better predictive performance than the traditional TWIST score. A physical examination can be the initial approach for ASP but cannot replace hematological and ultrasound examinations.
Our study has some limitations worth noting. Firstly, the retrospective design of this study may have inevitable recall and selection biases. Secondly, the number of cases included in our study is limited, and further large-sample and prospective multicenter studies are needed to validate the existing research results. However, our study has the largest number of pediatric ASP cases in the southwestern region of China and has certain representativeness and reference value.
Conclusions
In conclusion, this study collected clinical indicators of pediatric patients who visited Kunming Children’s Hospital for ASP for 9 years and underwent surgical treatment. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify independent risk factors for TT and construct a nomogram. A series of validation methods were used to confirm the accuracy and discriminatory power of the nomogram. This study is the largest sample size reported for constructing a prediction model in southwestern China, and the validation results demonstrate the excellent performance of the constructed model. It can assist pediatric surgeons in the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric ASP.
Acknowledgments
Funding: This study was supported by
Footnote
Reporting Checklist: The authors have completed the TRIPOD reporting checklist. Available at https://tau.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tau-23-634/rc
Data Sharing Statement: Available at https://tau.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tau-23-634/dss
Peer Review File: Available at https://tau.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tau-23-634/prf
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tau.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tau-23-634/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kunming Children’s Hospital (No. 2023-03-101-K01). Our study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). Furthermore, this study is retrospective and did not use identifiable information from the patients. Therefore, informed consent from the parents/guardians of children was not required.
Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
References
- Jefferies MT, Cox AC, Gupta A, et al. The management of acute testicular pain in children and adolescents. BMJ 2015;350:h1563. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ford KE, Cooper LL, Thenabadu S. Acute testicular pain in children: collaboration in timely management. Eur J Emerg Med 2015;22:55-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Lewis AG, Bukowski TP, Jarvis PD, et al. Evaluation of acute scrotum in the emergency department. J Pediatr Surg 1995;30:277-81; discussion 281-2. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Keays M, Rosenberg H. Testicular torsion. CMAJ 2019;191:E792. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Zhang X, Zhang J, Cai Z, et al. Effect of unilateral testicular torsion at different ages on male fertility. J Int Med Res 2020;48:300060520918792. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Thakkar HS, Yardley I, Kufeji D. Management of Paediatric Testicular Torsion - Are we adhering to Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) recommendations. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2018;100:397-400. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Zhao LC, Lautz TB, Meeks JJ, et al. Pediatric testicular torsion epidemiology using a national database: incidence, risk of orchiectomy and possible measures toward improving the quality of care. J Urol 2011;186:2009-13. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hu S, Guo M, Xiao Y, et al. Mapping trends and hotspot regarding testicular torsion: A bibliometric analysis of global research (2000-2022). Front Pediatr 2023;11:1121677. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yu C, Zhao J, Lu J, et al. Demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic factors associated with delayed diagnosis and management of pediatric testicular torsion in West China: a retrospective study of 301 cases in a single tertiary children's hospital. BMC Pediatr 2021;21:553. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Chen P, Yang Z, Chen N, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of cryptorchid testicular torsion in children: A 12-year retrospective study. Front Pediatr 2022;10:968997. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Cao G, Li Y, Wang J, et al. Gleason score, surgical and distant metastasis are associated with cancer-specific survival and overall survival in middle aged high-risk prostate cancer: A population-based study. Front Public Health 2022;10:1028905. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Zhanghuang C, Wang J, Yao Z, et al. Development and Validation of a Nomogram to Predict Cancer-Specific Survival in Elderly Patients With Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma. Front Public Health 2022;10:874427. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wang J, Zhanghuang C, Jin L, et al. Development and validation of a nomogram to predict cancer-specific survival in elderly patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: a population-based study. BMC Geriatr 2022;22:736. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Takeshita H, Tachibana K, Sugiyama H, et al. Nomogram predicting testicular torsion in Japanese patients with acute scrotal pain using physical examination findings and environmental conditions: Development and prospective external validation. Int J Urol 2022;29:42-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Chen P, Huang W, Liu L, et al. Predictive value of hematological parameters in testicular salvage: A 12-year retrospective review. Front Pediatr 2022;10:989112. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Castañeda-Sánchez I, Tully B, Shipman M, et al. Testicular torsion: A retrospective investigation of predictors of surgical outcomes and of remaining controversies. J Pediatr Urol 2017;13:516.e1-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Feng S, Yang H, Lou Y, et al. Clinical Characteristics of Testicular Torsion and Identification of Predictors of Testicular Salvage in Children: A Retrospective Study in a Single Institution. Urol Int 2020;104:878-83. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Zvizdic Z, Aganovic A, Milisic E, et al. Duration of symptoms is the only predictor of testicular salvage following testicular torsion in children: A case-control study. Am J Emerg Med 2021;41:197-200. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rub R, Lidawi G, Laukhtina E, et al. Impact of seasonal variations on incidence and laterality of testicular torsion. Int J Biometeorol 2023;67:857-63. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Marulaiah M, Gilhotra A, Moore L, et al. Testicular and paratesticular pathology in children: a 12-year histopathological review. World J Surg 2010;34:969-74. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tanaka K, Ogasawara Y, Nikai K, et al. Acute scrotum and testicular torsion in children: a retrospective study in a single institution. J Pediatr Urol 2020;16:55-60. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Chang CD, Lin JW, Lee CC, et al. Acute Epididymo-orchitis-Related Global Testicular Infarction: Clinical and Ultrasound Findings With an Emphasis on the Juxta-epididymal String-of-Bead Sign. Ultrasound Q 2016;32:283-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yucel C, Ozlem Ilbey Y. Predictive value of hematological parameters in testicular torsion: retrospective investigation of data from a high-volume tertiary care center. J Int Med Res 2019;47:730-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yilmaz M, Sahin Y, Hacibey I, et al. Should haematological inflammatory markers be included as an adjuvant in the differential diagnosis of acute scrotal pathologies? Andrologia 2022;54:e14374. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Delgado-Miguel C, García A, Muñoz-Serrano AJ, et al. The role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of testicular torsion in children. J Pediatr Urol 2022;18:697.e1-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gupta A, Dogra V. Role of color flow Doppler ultrasound in the evaluation of acute scrotal pain. Andrology 2021;9:1290-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Atkinson GO Jr, Patrick LE, Ball TI Jr, et al. The normal and abnormal scrotum in children: evaluation with color Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:613-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hendrikx AJ, Dang CL, Vroegindeweij D, et al. B-mode and colour-flow duplex ultrasonography: a useful adjunct in diagnosing scrotal diseases? Br J Urol 1997;79:58-65. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ota K, Fukui K, Oba K, et al. The role of ultrasound imaging in adult patients with testicular torsion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Ultrason (2001) 2019;46:325-34. [PubMed]
- Tian XM, Tan XH, Shi QL, et al. Risk Factors for Testicular Atrophy in Children With Testicular Torsion Following Emergent Orchiopexy. Front Pediatr 2020;8:584796. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Qin KR, Qu LG. Diagnosing with a TWIST: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Testicular Torsion Risk Score. J Urol 2022;208:62-70. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sheth KR, Keays M, Grimsby GM, et al. Diagnosing Testicular Torsion before Urological Consultation and Imaging: Validation of the TWIST Score. J Urol 2016;195:1870-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hisamatsu E, Haruna A, Sugita Y, et al. Validation of testicular workup for ischemia and suspected torsion score in patients with acute scrotum. J Pediatr Urol 2022;18:684-90. [Crossref] [PubMed]