Feasibility of androgen-deprivation and radiation therapy with docetaxel for localized high-risk prostate cancer
Editorial Commentary

Feasibility of androgen-deprivation and radiation therapy with docetaxel for localized high-risk prostate cancer

Hiroaki Iwamoto ORCID logo, Kouji Izumi, Atsushi Mizokami

Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan

Correspondence to: Kouji Izumi, MD, PhD. Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Takaramachi13-1, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-8640, Japan. Email: azuizu2003@yahoo.co.jp.

Comment on: Sartor O, Karrison TG, Sandler HM, et al. Androgen Deprivation and Radiotherapy with or Without Docetaxel for Localized Highrisk Prostate Cancer: Long-term Follow-up from the Randomized NRG Oncology RTOG 0521 Trial. Eur Urol 2023;84:156-63.


Keywords: Prostate cancer (PC); androgen deprivation; docetaxel; localized high risk prostate cancer; CCL2


Submitted Dec 21, 2023. Accepted for publication May 08, 2024. Published online Jun 27, 2024.

doi: 10.21037/tau-23-669


Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common cancer in men and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in developed countries. Most PC-related deaths are caused by metastatic disease, and approximately 10% of newly diagnosed PC cases have distant metastases (1). Although the prognosis of localized PC is generally good, high-risk PC has a significantly worse prognosis than low- and intermediate-risk PC, with a 15-year PC-specific mortality rate of 26–37% (2). Although each guideline defines high risk slightly differently, treatments for high-risk or locally advanced PC include radical prostatectomy + extended pelvic lymph node dissection or radiotherapy (RT) + long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) has been reported as a useful treatment for oligometastatic PC (3). Because relapse occurs despite these treatments, many strategies have been considered to improve outcomes. STAMPEDE trial showed that the addition of abiraterone with prednisolone to ADT improves the prognosis of hormone-sensitive metastatic PC patients (4). Furthermore, STAMPEDE and CHAARTED trials showed that the addition of docetaxel to ADT improves the prognosis of castration-sensitive metastatic PC patients (5,6). Therefore, docetaxel therapy was considered a promising strategy, and the phase III NRG Oncology Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0521 trial was conducted (7). In an interim analysis of the RTOG 0521 trial, the docetaxel group (ADT + RT + docetaxel) significantly improved the 4-year overall survival (OS) compared with the control group (ADT + RT) in patients with high-risk nonmetastatic PC (4-year OS: 93% vs. 89%, respectively). In addition, the disease-free survival (DFS) rate improved, and the distant metastasis rate decreased in the docetaxel group. However, long-term follow-up (median follow-up of survivors, 10.4 years) showed no significant differences in OS, DFS, or distant metastasis rates between the two groups (7). This study suggests that docetaxel should not be used in high-risk localized PC. The results are very interesting and provide valuable knowledge for both patients and physicians. However, the 4-year OS was significantly prolonged in the docetaxel group, making it difficult to believe that there is no benefit from docetaxel.

Various studies other than the RTOG 0521 trial have also reported that docetaxel provides no clinical benefit for nonmetastatic PC (7). However, the definition of high-risk PC in each study varied. In the RTOG 0521 trial, 52.8% of the cases had a Gleason’s score (GS) of ≥9, and 16% had a GS of 7 (7). Thus, a fairly wide range of cases was included among the high-risk PC. Because the prognosis of patients with high-risk PC, including Gleason pattern 5, is poor, it may be possible to identify patients who would benefit from docetaxel by further narrowing down the range of cases (8). GS is a very useful prognostic factor for PC; however, it may be possible to identify cases using serum markers. Various serum biomarkers for PC have been reported (9). These include microRNA, androgen receptor mutant, bone metabolism, neuroendocrine, and metabolite biomarkers, which may guide treatment selection and sequencing in an era of personalized therapy (9).

Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), which regulates the conversion of pyruvate to lactate, is a known prognostic factor in advanced PC (8). LDH is a tetrameric enzyme consisting of three different monomeric subunits, such as LDH-A, which is involved in docetaxel resistance (10). In the future, it may be possible to extract cases in which docetaxel is beneficial using LDH values.

CCL2 is a 13-kDa protein composed of 76 amino acids, also known as monocyte chemotaxis protein-1, and was first discovered among CC chemokines in 1989. Several recent studies have reported on the role of CCL2 in various cancers, including PC, which has attracted much attention. Previously, we showed that the suppression of AR signaling not only inhibits PC cell proliferation and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) secretion but also promotes CCL2 secretion to enable PC cell metastasis. These results suggest that CCL2 is a useful biomarker for PC. In 379 patients, we analyzed serum CCL2 levels measured during CCL2 prostate biopsy and long-term observation (median follow-up, 110.4 months) (11). Analysis of patients with nonmetastatic castration-sensitive PC (nmCSPC) showed that CCL2 is a predictor of OS and castration-resistant PC-free survival in nmCSPC (11). CCL2 is a prognostic factor for nmCSPC and may be useful in identifying patients with high-risk nmCSPC. In a basic study, CCL2 levels of the wild-type PC cell line (DU145), docetaxel-resistant PC cell line (DU145-TxR), and cabazitaxel-resistant PC cell line (DU145 TxR/CxR) were examined, and DU145-TxR DU145 TxR/CxR had significantly higher CCL2 levels than DU145 (12). CCL2 treatment of DU145 resulted in cabazitaxel tolerance, and CCR2 (specific receptor for CCL2) antagonist treatment of DU145-TxR/CxR also reduced cabazitaxel tolerance (12). CCL2-mediated docetaxel resistance was also reported. The inhibition of CCL2 activity has antitumor effects, and the combination of CCL2 inhibition and docetaxel enhanced the therapeutic effect of docetaxel (13). CCL2 may not only be a biomarker of high-risk nmCSPC but may also be a predictor of response to taxane-based chemotherapy.

miRNAs are endogenous short non-coding RNAs that bind to complementary messenger RNAs and repress gene expression post-transcriptionally. Changes in miRNA expression can affect important cellular processes such as cell cycle, proliferation, apoptosis, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) (9). Various miRNAs have been reported as biomarkers in PC (9). miRNA-21 levels were higher in docetaxel-resistant castration-resistant prostate cancers (CRPCs) than in docetaxel-sensitive CRPCs (14). In addition, miRNA-200 and miRNA-17 levels were associated with improved PSA response and OS in CRPCs treated with docetaxel (15). These miRNAs may be involved in the mechanism of docetaxel resistance and may serve as biomarkers of docetaxel resistance.

Previous studies have shown that docetaxel should not be used for broadly defined high-risk localized PC. Docetaxel is not recommended to improve the prognosis of high-risk localized PC. As mentioned earlier, narrowly defined high-risk PC that would benefit from docetaxel may be identified using various biomarkers; thus, future studies are required.


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned by the editorial office, Translational Andrology and Urology. The article has undergone external peer review.

Peer Review File: Available at https://tau.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tau-23-669/prf

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tau.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tau-23-669/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Iwamoto H, Izumi K, Shimada T, et al. Androgen receptor signaling-targeted therapy and taxane chemotherapy induce visceral metastasis in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate 2021;81:72-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Eggener SE, Scardino PT, Walsh PC, et al. Predicting 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2011;185:869-75. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Mikropoulos C, Saxby H, Boussios S. Prostate cancer-what about oligometastatic disease and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy?-a narrative review. Ann Palliat Med 2023;12:646-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Attard G, Murphy L, Clarke NW, et al. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone with or without enzalutamide for patients with metastatic prostate cancer starting androgen deprivation therapy: final results from two randomised phase 3 trials of the STAMPEDE platform protocol. Lancet Oncol 2023;24:443-56. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Kyriakopoulos CE, Chen YH, Carducci MA, et al. Chemohormonal Therapy in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Long-Term Survival Analysis of the Randomized Phase III E3805 CHAARTED Trial. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:1080-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Clarke NW, Ali A, Ingleby FC, et al. Addition of docetaxel to hormonal therapy in low- and high-burden metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer: long-term survival results from the STAMPEDE trial. Ann Oncol 2019;30:1992-2003. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Sartor O, Karrison TG, Sandler HM, et al. Androgen Deprivation and Radiotherapy with or Without Docetaxel for Localized High-risk Prostate Cancer: Long-term Follow-up from the Randomized NRG Oncology RTOG 0521 Trial. Eur Urol 2023;84:156-63. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Nakagawa R, Iwamoto H, Makino T, et al. Development of a Prognostic Model of Overall Survival for Metastatic Hormone-Naïve Prostate Cancer in Japanese Men. Cancers (Basel) 2022;14:4822. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Saxby H, Mikropoulos C, Boussios S. An Update on the Prognostic and Predictive Serum Biomarkers in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020;10:549. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Muramatsu H, Sumitomo M, Morinaga S, et al. Targeting lactate dehydrogenase‑A promotes docetaxel‑induced cytotoxicity predominantly in castration‑resistant prostate cancer cells. Oncol Rep 2019;42:224-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Iwamoto H, Izumi K, Nakagawa R, et al. Serum CCL2 Is a Prognostic Biomarker for Non-Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. Biomedicines 2022;10:2369. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Natsagdorj A, Izumi K, Hiratsuka K, et al. CCL2 induces resistance to the antiproliferative effect of cabazitaxel in prostate cancer cells. Cancer Sci 2019;110:279-88. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Qian DZ, Rademacher BL, Pittsenbarger J, et al. CCL2 is induced by chemotherapy and protects prostate cancer cells from docetaxel-induced cytotoxicity. Prostate 2010;70:433-42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Ibrahim NH, Abdellateif MS, Thabet G, et al. Combining PHI and miRNAs as Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis. Clin Lab 2019; [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Lin HM, Castillo L, Mahon KL, et al. Circulating microRNAs are associated with docetaxel chemotherapy outcome in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 2014;110:2462-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Download Citation