Strategies for optimizing pain management after ureteroscopy
The prevalence of kidney stones in the United States has nearly doubled since the 1990s, affecting roughly one in 11 individuals (1). This surge in stone disease may be compounded by the effects of climate change, as elevated temperatures increase risk for kidney stones (2). Ureteroscopy (URS) is a common and effective procedure for stone removal; however postoperative pain, stent-related symptoms, and unplanned healthcare encounters can significantly affect patients’ quality of life (3). Thus, considerable research has been dedicated to identifying optimal medications or regimens to mitigate patient pain and discomfort through peri-, intra-, and post-operative approaches. Several new, high-quality studies have expanded the knowledge base on this topic, looking at nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), pregabalin, local anesthetics, drug combinations and alternative remedies.
NSAIDs have been shown to be highly effective for reducing pain after URS. The 2021 SKOPE trial, a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study, investigated the effectiveness of NSAIDs compared to opioids for post-URS pain control (4). This study compared ketorolac to oxycodone and showed that NSAIDs provided pain control that was non-inferior to opioids and, notably, led to a shorter recovery period. The outcomes of the SKOPE trial were corroborated by Demasi et al. in 2022, who conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing ketorolac to oxycodone-acetaminophen for pain control post-URS (5). Similarly, ketorolac was found to be non-inferior to opioids, furthering support for opioid-sparing medication protocols. In 2022, Bevill et al. also studied NSAIDs in a broader cohort including older patients, those on anticoagulation, and those experiencing chronic pain (3). In these patients, selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor yielded comparable pain control without the potential risks associated with non-specific COX inhibitors which carry a risk of gastric and renal toxicity in longer courses.
Combinations of drugs have also been utilized to reduce symptoms after URS. In a 2023 meta-analysis assessing optimal post-URS pain control regimens, Hinojosa-Gonzalez et al. determined that the combination of an alpha-1 blocker, silodosin, and an anticholinergic, solifenacin, to the be the most effective at for pain control post-URS. This was followed by silodosin alone, solifenacin alone, and the combination of solifenacin and pregabalin. This study included assessment of urinary symptoms, pain and sexual performance (6).
In a contrasting study published in 2023, Rosen et al. conducted a prospective, single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial of the effect of a single, preoperative dose of pregabalin versus placebo on pain after URS (7). The primary outcome was patient-reported pain levels one hour after URS. Secondary outcomes included additional pain scores at various intervals, medication prescriptions in the month after surgery, post-operative communications with the urology team, emergency department visits, and re-admissions. Patients who received pregabalin actually showed increased pain scores compared to the placebo group. There were no measurable differences in recovery room time, patients receiving discharge opioids, or quantity discharge opioids between groups. Collectively, these findings demonstrated that pregabalin did not offer a clinically significant benefit pain reduction. Even after controlling for age and preoperative pain scores through multivariable analysis, the results consistently indicated increased pain scores in patients who received pregabalin. This study stands out as a novel addition to the research on medication regimens for discharge planning, offering a distinctive perspective and contributing to the expansion of the limited literature on this subject.
Some alternative remedies have also been examined. A 2023 study showed that cannabinoid (CBD) oil lacked a significant impact on pain scores when compared to placebo (8). This finding was possibly limited by the utilization of the lowest dose of CBD in the study.
In contrast to the considerable research evaluating regimens for post-operative pain control, studies evaluating intra- and pre-operative medications remain relatively unexplored. In a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial in 2022, Syed et al. investigated the impact of administering ketorolac during anesthesia induction on peri-operative pain and opioid requirements (9) Administration of ketorolac during URS was associated with a notable reduction in narcotic requirements. In 2020, Tawfeek et al. studied the administration of alpha blockers one week pre-operatively and two weeks post-operatively (10). Alpha blockers were associated with a decrease in post-operative pain, need for analgesia, and hospital stay in hours.
Topical anesthetics have also been shown to potentially reduce pain. In a 2017 randomized study of intra-ureteral lidocaine, Roberts et al. found that the direct instillation of lidocaine into the ureter did not significantly improve pain symptoms after URS (11). Overall, studies evaluating interventions to impact intra-operative analgesic requirements are limited and the impact on post-operative pain remains unclear. Studies of belladonna and opium (B&O) suppositories have yielded diverse results. Lee et al. showed that preoperative administration of B&O suppositories improved quality of life measures and reduced urinary-related pain, while Fetzer et al. observed a decrease in urinary urgency but no discernible impact on mean pain scores between cohort groups (12,13). The scarcity of studies investigating pre-operative medications to mitigate pain highlights a significant gap in research and stresses the need for additional research to enhance our understanding and improve these pain management strategies.
The rising prevalence of kidney stones and subsequent increase in endoscopic stone surgery has prompted intensified research into optimizing pain management strategies during and after this procedure. The efficacy of NSAIDs in post-URS pain control regimens has been well-established through rigorous studies, offering an effective alternative to opioids. However, the nuanced outcomes of recent investigations, such as the contradictory findings regarding pregabalin’s effects, highlight the complexity of improving pain management. The scarcity of research on intra- and pre-operative medications, as well as alternative remedies, underscores the need for further exploration to enhance patient outcomes and refine clinical protocols.
Acknowledgments
Funding: None.
Footnote
Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned by the editorial office, Translational Andrology and Urology. The article did not undergo external peer review.
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tau.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tau-24-45/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
References
- Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, et al. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol 2012;62:160-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Maline GE, Goldfarb DS. Climate change and kidney stones. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2024;33:89-96. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bevill MD, Schubbe ME, Flynn KJ, et al. Prospective Comparison of Opioid vs Nonopioid Pain Regimen After Ureteroscopy. J Endourol 2022;36:734-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Fedrigon D, Faris A, Kachroo N, et al. SKOPE-Study of Ketorolac vs Opioid for Pain after Endoscopy: A Double-Blinded Randomized Control Trial in Patients Undergoing Ureteroscopy. J Urol 2021;206:373-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Demasi M, Segall M, Mengotto A, et al. Optimizing pain management following kidney stone surgery: can we avoid narcotics? World J Urol 2022;40:3061-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hinojosa-Gonzalez DE, Segall MR, Eisner BH. Pharmacological Management of Ureteral Stent-related Symptoms: A Systematic Review, Bayesian Network Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression. J Urol 2023;210:739-49. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rosen GH, Hargis PA, Kahveci A, et al. Randomized Controlled Trial of Single-dose Perioperative Pregabalin in Ureteroscopy. J Urol 2023;210:517-28. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Narang G, Moore J, Wymer K, et al. Effect of Cannabidiol Oil on Post-ureteroscopy Pain for Urinary Calculi: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial. J Urol 2023;209:726-33. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Syed JS, Khan A, Van-Ryn MG, et al. Toradol to Reduce Ureteroscopy Symptoms Trial (TRUST). Urology 2022;165:134-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tawfeek AM, Abdelwahab MS, Higazy A, et al. Effect of perioperative selective alpha-1 blockers in non-stented ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for ureteric stones: a randomized controlled trial. Cent European J Urol 2020;73:520-5. [PubMed]
- Roberts G, Leslie R, Robb S, et al. Intraureteral lidocaine for ureteral stent symptoms post-ureteroscopy: A randomized, phase 2, placebo-controlled trial. Can Urol Assoc J 2017;11:326-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Lee FC, Holt SK, Hsi RS, et al. Preoperative Belladonna and Opium Suppository for Ureteral Stent Pain: A Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Study. Urology 2017;100:27-32. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Fetzer SJ, Goodwin L, Stanizzi M. Effectiveness of a Pre-emptive Preoperative Belladonna and Opium Suppository on Postoperative Urgency and Pain After Ureteroscopy. J Perianesth Nurs 2019;34:594-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]