Association of chronic constipation and chronic diarrhea with renal stones: a cross-sectional study of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2010
Original Article

Association of chronic constipation and chronic diarrhea with renal stones: a cross-sectional study of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2010

Sikui Shen1#, Xingpeng Di1#, Liyuan Xiang1,2, Hong Li1, Banghua Liao1

1Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; 2Department of Clinical Research Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Contributions: (I) Conception and design: H Li, B Liao; (II) Administrative support: B Liao, X Di; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: None; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: S Shen, L Xiang; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: S Shen, X Di, L Xiang; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscripts: All authors.

#These authors contributed equally to this work.

Correspondence to: Hong Li, MD; Banghua Liao, MD. Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 of Guoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu 610041, China. Email: lihonghxhx@scu.edu.cn; 11511761@qq.com.

Background: Renal stone is a highly prevalent life-long disease with a high recurrence rate. Chronic bowel diseases, including chronic gastrointestinal symptoms (chronic constipation or chronic diarrhea), are common gastrointestinal problems. We aimed to evaluate the associations of chronic constipation and chronic diarrhea with renal stones.

Methods: This large-scale, cross-sectional study was performed within participants (≥20 years old) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2007 to 2010. Logistic regression and sensitivity analyses were conducted to clarify the association between chronic bowel diseases and renal stones.

Results: A total of 8,067 participants aged ≥20 years were included. The prevalence of renal stones is 9.14%. Chronic diarrhea was positively related to the risk of renal stones [odds ratio (OR) =1.681, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.212 to 2.330, P=0.004] after adjusting for all covariates. In participants with body mass index (BMI) over 30 kg/m2, chronic constipation was correlated with kidney stones in fully adjusted model 2 (OR =2.142, 95% CI: 1.389 to 3.303, P=0.004).

Conclusions: Our findings provide evidence that chronic diarrhea is associated with an increased risk of renal stones. Chronic constipation is positively related to the risk of renal stones in participants with BMI over 30 kg/m2. Health care should focus more on bowel health status for the prevention of related diseases. More prospective cohort studies are needed.

Keywords: Chronic bowel disease; renal stone; constipation; diarrhea; National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)


Submitted Apr 28, 2024. Accepted for publication Aug 19, 2024. Published online Sep 26, 2024.

doi: 10.21037/tau-24-212


Highlight box

Key findings

• Chronic diarrhea correlates with high risk of kidney stones.

• Chronic constipation is positively associated with the risk of kidney stones in participants with body mass index (BMI) over 30 kg/m2.

What is known and what is new?

• Kidney stone disease is highly prevalent with a high recurrence rate. However, the etiologies and mechanism of stone formation is largely unknown.

• This study identified potential associations of chronic constipation and chronic diarrhea with kidney stones.

What is the implication, and what should change now?

• Emerging evidence indicates the impact of chronic bowel diseases on the formation of kidney stones, which is expected to arouse great attention in the future.

• Health care should focus more on bowel health status for the prevention of related diseases.


Introduction

Renal stone is a highly prevalent urological disease worldwide (1), with a high recurrence rate of approximately 50% within five years (2). Currently, kidney stone disease expends $2 billion each year, causing great health and economic burdens to patients (3). The development of renal stone is a complex process affected by multiple risk factors, such as genetic factors, anatomical abnormalities, imbalanced dietary habits, metabolic diseases, and others (4).

Previous studies show that host components (e.g., host immune system) affect the microbial community (5,6). Pathogenetic changes in microorganisms contribute to noncommunicable diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), metabolic diseases, and others (6). Chronic bowel diseases are the most common gastrointestinal problems, including chronic gastrointestinal symptoms (i.e., chronic constipation and chronic diarrhea). Chronic constipation and chronic diarrhea are two common bowel habit abnormalities. However, the association of chronic constipation and chronic diarrhea with renal stones is still under-studied and needs to be clarified.

Hence, we performed the current study using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) dataset to identify the relationships of chronic constipation and chronic diarrhea with the risk of kidney stones. We hypothesized that chronic bowel diseases were related to high risk of kidney stones. We present this article in accordance with the STROBE reporting checklist (available at https://tau.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tau-24-212/rc).


Methods

Study population

NHANES is a prospective cross-sectional study with interviews and examinations every two years. We enrolled 20,686 participants aged 20 years and above from 2007 to 2010. Then participants with missing information on renal stones and chronic bowel diseases were excluded. Finally, 8,067 participants were eligible for complete case analysis. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). The ethical review board of the National Center for Health Statistics granted approval to the NHANES protocols. Written informed consent was acquired by the NHANES for participating in the survey.

Assessment of chronic constipation and chronic diarrhea

Based on previous studies (7,8), participants who were considered to have chronic constipation or chronic diarrhea were enrolled according to the Bowel Health Questionnaire section. The questionnaire was performed in the NHANES Mobile Examination Center (MEC) by well-trained interviewers. The Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) was used to evaluate bowel health status (9). Chronic constipation was defined as a usual or most common stool type of BSFS Type 1 (separate hard lumps, like nuts) or Type 2 (sausage-like, but lumpy). Chronic diarrhea was determined by a usual or most common stool type of BSFS Type 6 (fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool) or Type 7 (watery, no solid pieces). The other subjects were identified as having normal or asymptomatic bowel health status.

Renal stone assessment

A history of renal stone was determined by the questionnaire “Have you ever had kidney stones?” (10). A “yes” response indicates a renal stone history before.

Covariates

Based on previous studies (11,12), we included demographic data (i.e., age, education level which is divided by high school degree, family income-to-poverty ratio which is divided by 1.3 and 3.5, and race, physical examination [e.g., body mass index (BMI), kg/m2], and questionnaires [e.g., recreational activities (none, moderate activity, vigorous activity), smoking history and alcohol consumption history (<1 time per week, 1–3 times per week, or ≥4 times per week)]. The BMI was classified as ≤20, >20 ≤25, >25 ≤30, or >30 kg/m2 groups. Diabetes mellitus (DM) was diagnosed according to a previous study (13).

Statistical analysis

The sampling weights, strata, and primary sample units were used according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, which is publicly available at https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/tutorials/default.aspx. Continuous variables were presented by mean ± standard deviation (SD), while the categorical variables were presented as counting numbers (n). Survey-weighted linear regression was applied for analysis of continuous variables, while a survey-weighted chi-square test was used for analysis of categorical variables. To clarify the correlation between chronic bowel diseases and renal stones, three logistic regression models were conducted. No covariates were adjusted in crude model. The fully-adjusted model was adjusted for all covariates. To examine the sensitivity of the outcome, we performed multiple imputation by using the R multiple imputation procedure to process missing data on independent variables (14,15).

The sampling weight was chosen according to the guidelines of the NHANES database (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm). R software version 4.1 (http://www.R-project.org; The R Foundation) and EmpowerStats (http://www.empowerstats.com, X&Y Solutions, Inc., Xianyang, China) were used for the statistical analyses. A two-tailed P<0.05 indicated a significant difference.


Results

A total of 8,067 participants aged 20 years or older were included (Figure 1). The mean (SD) age was 49.31±17.33 years, with 46.45% males and 53.55% females. Most of the participants were non-Hispanic White (51.73%), above high school grade (73.51%), had a family income-to-poverty ratio between 1.3 and 3.5 (37.60%), were obese (37.30%), were previous smokers (52.60%), non-drinkers (62.37%), had little recreational activity (53.01%), without DM (82.47%), hypertension (58.42%) and coronary heart disease (95.74%). The renal stones prevalence rate was 9.14% in the whole US population. In participants with chronic constipation, the incidence of renal stone was 9.03%. The prevalence of renal stone in the chronic diarrhea group was 13.72% (Table 1).

Figure 1 Participant screening of NHANES 2007–2010. NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Table 1

Basic characteristics of the study population in NHANES 2007–2010 (n=8,067)

Characteristics All Chronic bowel disease P value
None (N=6,813) Chronic constipation (N=576) Chronic diarrhea (N=678)
Age (years) 49.31±17.33 49.11±17.35 47.20±17.84 53.11±16.14 <0.001
Gender <0.001
   Male 3,747 (46.45) 3,025 (44.40) 364 (63.19) 358 (52.80)
   Female 4,320 (53.55) 3,788 (55.60) 212 (36.81) 320 (47.20)
Race 0.007
   Non-Hispanic Black 1,511 (18.73) 1,253 (18.39) 129 (22.40) 129 (19.03)
   Non-Hispanic White 4,173 (51.73) 3,590 (52.69) 262 (45.49) 321 (47.35)
   Hispanic/Mexican 2,088 (25.88) 1,719 (25.23) 164 (28.47) 205 (30.24)
   Other race 295 (3.66) 251 (3.68) 21 (3.65) 23 (3.39)
Education level <0.001
   ≤ High school 2,137 (26.49) 1,688 (24.78) 182 (31.60) 267 (39.38)
   > High school 5,930 (73.51) 5,125 (75.22) 394 (68.40) 411 (60.62)
Family income-to-poverty ratio <0.001
   <1.3 2,411 (29.89) 1,948 (28.59) 206 (35.76) 257 (37.91)
   ≥1.3, <3.5 3,033 (37.60) 2,570 (37.72) 218 (37.85) 245 (36.14)
   ≥3.5 2,623 (32.52) 2,295 (33.69) 152 (26.39) 176 (25.96)
BMI (kg/m2) 0.006
   ≤20 337 (4.18) 275 (4.04) 32 (5.56) 30 (4.42)
   >20, ≤25 1,955 (24.23) 1,651 (24.23) 175 (30.38) 129 (19.03)
   >25, ≤30 2,766 (34.29) 2,355 (34.57) 191 (33.16) 220 (32.45)
   >30 3,009 (37.30) 2,532 (37.16) 178 (30.90) 299 (44.10)
Smoking history <0.001
   Non-smoker 3,824 (47.40) 3,247 (47.66) 296 (51.39) 281 (41.45)
   Smoker 4,243 (52.60) 3,566 (52.34) 280 (48.61) 397 (58.55)
Alcohol drinking history (drinks/week) <0.001
   <1 5,031 (62.37) 4,163 (61.10) 415 (72.05) 453 (66.81)
   1–3 2,082 (25.81) 1,823 (26.76) 119 (20.66) 140 (20.65)
   ≥4 954 (11.83) 827 (12.14) 42 (7.29) 85 (12.54)
Recreational activity <0.001
   None 4,276 (53.01) 3,506 (51.46) 348 (60.42) 422 (62.24)
   Moderate 2,125 (26.34) 1,837 (26.96) 124 (21.53) 164 (24.19)
   Vigorous 1,666 (20.65) 1,470 (21.58) 104 (18.06) 92 (13.57)
Diabetes mellitus <0.001
   No 6,653 (82.47) 5,653 (82.97) 484 (84.03) 516 (76.11)
   Yes 1,414 (17.53) 1,160 (17.03) 92 (15.97) 162 (23.89)
Hypertension 0.01
   No 4,713 (58.42) 4,009 (58.84) 361 (62.67) 343 (50.59)
   Yes 3,354 (41.58) 2,804 (41.16) 215 (37.33) 335 (49.41)
Coronary heart disease 0.048
   No 7,723 (95.74) 6,528 (95.82) 553 (96.01) 642 (94.69)
   Yes 344 (4.26) 285 (4.18) 23 (3.99) 36 (5.31)
Renal stone <0.001
   No 7,330 (90.86) 6,221 (91.31) 524 (90.97) 585 (86.28)
   Yes 737 (9.14) 592 (8.69) 52 (9.03) 93 (13.72)

Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± standard deviation. NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; BMI, body mass index.

In the crude model l, there was a significant difference in the outcome between patients with chronic diarrhea and those with renal stones [odds ratio (OR) =1.785, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.365 to 2.334, P<0.001] (Table 2). Model 1 revealed that chronic diarrhea was still a risk factor for renal stones (OR =1.741, 95% CI: 1.305 to 2.322, P=0.001). A fully adjusted model 2 revealed similar results (OR =1.681, 95% CI: 1.212 to 2.330, P=0.004). Subgroup analysis revealed no effect modifiers for the association of chronic constipation or chronic diarrhea with renal stones (Table S1). Furthermore, we investigated whether diarrhea or constipation is a risk factor for kidney stones in people stratified by BMI (Table 3). In participants with BMI over 30 kg/m2, chronic constipation was positively correlated with the risk of kidney stones after adjustment for all covariates (OR =2.142, 95% CI: 1.389 to 3.303, P=0.004). A similar relationship was also found in participants with chronic diarrhea in the 25–30 kg/m2 BMI subgroup (OR =2.509, 95% CI: 1.460 to 4.312, P=0.002) compared with none chronic bowel disease group.

Table 2

Adjusted association of chronic bowel diseases with renal stones

Chronic bowel disease Crude model Model 1 Model 2§
OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value
None 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
Chronic constipation 1.059 (0.755, 1.483) 0.74 1.251 (0.895, 1.750) 0.20 1.263 (0.891, 1.790) 0.17
Chronic diarrhea 1.785 (1.365, 2.334) <0.001 1.741 (1.305, 2.322) 0.001 1.681 (1.212, 2.330) 0.004

, adjusted for none; , adjusted for demographic characteristics (age, gender, race, family income-to-poverty ratio, and education level); §, adjusted for demographic characteristics in Model 1 and body mass index, smoking history, alcohol drinking history, recreational activity, diabetes mellitus, blood hypertension, and coronary heart disease. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Table 3

Adjusted association of chronic bowel diseases with renal stones, stratified by BMI

Chronic bowel disease BMI (≤20 kg/m2) BMI (>20, ≤25 kg/m2) BMI (>25, ≤30 kg/m2) BMI (>30 kg/m2)
OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
None 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
Chronic constipation
   Crude model 0.987 (0.096, 10.136) 0.99 0.846 (0.361, 1.982) 0.70 0.871 (0.423, 1.792) 0.71 1.587 (0.987, 2.550) 0.056
   Model 1 0.918 (0.059, 14.356) 0.95 0.905 (0.375, 2.183) 0.83 0.995 (0.482, 2.054) 0.99 2.098 (1.330, 3.310) 0.004
   Model 2§ 0.743 (0.025, 21.713) 0.87 0.813 (0.334, 1.977) 0.66 0.971 (0.445, 2.120) 0.94 2.142 (1.389, 3.303) 0.004
Chronic diarrhea
   Crude model 2.589 (0.390, 17.176) 0.33 1.235 (0.522, 2.924) 0.63 2.615 (1.585, 4.314) <0.001 1.420 (0.963, 2.093) 0.07
   Model 1 3.835 (0.658, 22.348) 0.15 1.073 (0.435, 2.651) 0.88 2.615 (1.592, 4.297) <0.001 1.449 (0.972, 2.160) 0.08
   Model 2§ 4.831 (0.811, 28.775) 0.10 1.096 (0.447, 2.686) 0.84 2.509 (1.460, 4.312) 0.002 1.406 (0.901, 2.193) 0.15

, adjusted for none; , adjusted for demographic characteristics (age, gender, race, family income-to-poverty ratio, and education level); §, adjusted for demographic characteristics in model1 and smoking history, alcohol drinking history, recreational activity, diabetes mellitus, blood hypertension, and coronary heart disease. BMI, body mass index; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Furthermore, we performed a sensitivity analysis using multiple imputation method. A comparison between the complete case analysis and multiple imputation analysis was performed. The distribution of the data was similar, and the incidence rates in the complete case analysis and multiple imputation analysis were 9.14% and 9.21% respectively (Table S2). The fully adjusted model in multiple imputation analysis showed a significant difference between chronic diarrhea and renal stones (OR =1.527, 95% CI: 1.128 to 2.068, P=0.006) (Table 4).

Table 4

The comparison between complete data analysis and multiple imputation analysis for detection of sensitivity

Chronic bowel disease Complete data Multiple imputation
OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value
None 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
Chronic constipation 1.059 (0.755, 1.483) 0.74 1.042 (0.757, 1.433) 0.80
Chronic diarrhea 1.785 (1.365, 2.334) <0.001 1.527 (1.128, 2.068) 0.006

Adjusted for age, gender, race, family income-to-poverty ratio, education level, body mass index, smoking history, alcohol drinking history, recreational activity, diabetes mellitus, blood hypertension, and coronary heart disease. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.


Discussion

Based on a large-scale prospective cross-sectional sample of the NHANES dataset, the prevalence rate of renal stones was approximately 9.14% in the US population. Among the participants, 13.72% participants with chronic diarrhea had a history of renal stones. A total of 9.03% participants with renal stones reported chronic constipation. Our results revealed a positive association between chronic diarrhea and the risk of renal stones. However, the impact of chronic constipation on renal stones was not significant.

In our study, chronic diarrhea was associated with an increased risk of renal stones. Chronic diarrhea contributes to urolithiasis through multiple processes. Urolithiasis is a common health problem in the tropics. Higher climate temperature leads to fluid loss from the skin, and insufficient drinking water causes chronic diarrhea, which further promotes the development of urolithiasis (16). One random study demonstrated that in elderly people aged 60 years or older, urolithiasis was associated with asymptomatic diarrhea (17). The change in the urine pH value might be one of the reasons for this difference. Gastrointestinal disorders can cause urolithiasis through hyperconcentrated acidic urine induced by hyperoxaluria or diarrhea (18). Untreated celiac disease, a malabsorptive disorder, is associated with a high risk of urolithiasis (19).

The symptoms of urolithiasis, especially calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis, are sensitive to gastrointestinal disorders. Gut mucosa absorption affects calcium and oxalate metabolism, thereby promoting the development of hypercalciuria and hyperoxaluria (20). Existing epidemiological observational evidence has demonstrated that IBD, especially Crohn’s disease, increases the risk of kidney stones (21). Another nationwide population-based cohort study also indicated that IBD patients have a 2-fold greater risk of urolithiasis, especially patients with Crohn’s disease (22). A recent study revealed that the entire gut microbiome was more likely to engage in oxalate absorption and other risk factors for stone formation (23).

The components of the bowel microbiome affect host metabolism and health. Abnormalities in the intestinal microbiome are associated with recurrent kidney stones (24). Recent studies have demonstrated that fecal and urinary microbiota were dysbiosis in patients with renal stones (25,26). A lack of O. formigenes colonization is positively associated with kidney stones (27). Diarrhea has long been associated with gut microorganism imbalance. A previous study confirmed that the urinary excretion of oxalate and urea was reduced in probiotic (Lactobacillus) pretreated rats. The results indicated that probiotics could help catabolize oxalate to prevent renal stones (28). In contrast, a recent study reported the opposite result. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of stool and 24-hour urine samples indicated no significant difference between Lactobacillus/Bifidobacterium and renal stones (29). However, further studies are needed to determine the function of these microorganisms in the gut. Reducing chronic diarrhea is helpful for maintaining the gut probiotics, which may prevent renal stones.

Notably, a cross-sectional study of the NHANES demonstrated that chronic diarrhea was related to depression (9). Intriguingly, another study suggested that depression indicates a high risk of renal stones (30). The interactions among psychology, bowel status and urolithiasis may provide novel insight. Additional studies regarding the impact of psychogastroenterology on bowel status and renal stones are warranted to clarify the associations among them.

Chronic constipation was not associated with the overall risk of renal stones in this study. Few studies have investigated the association between constipation and urolithiasis. A previous study revealed that hydration is important for maintaining health, in relation to recognition and kidney stones (31). Increased fluid intake, not alkali or oxalate intake, decreases calcium oxalate supersaturation (32). Inversely, irritated bowel disease with constipation is a symptom cluster affected by diverse pathologies including gut microbiota imbalance, immune dysfunction, brain-gut interactions, intestinal permeability changes, and psychosocial status disorders (33). Interestingly, chronic constipation was found to be associated with the risk of kidney stones in participants with BMI over 30 kg/m2. Studies have indicated that obesity is related to an increased risk of kidney stones (34,35). Furthermore, a cross-sectional study revealed that Crohn’s disease patients with visceral obesity had higher incidence of chronic constipation (36). Another study demonstrated that children with constipation were more likely to be overweight. Thus, we speculate that BMI may play an important role in the relationship between chronic constipation and the risk of renal stones (37).

To our knowledge, we comprehensively analyzed the relationships of chronic constipation and chronic diarrhea with renal stones based on the large-scale prospective NHANES dataset, which represents the population in the US. We focused on chronic constipation and diarrhea in the US population. Furthermore, we evaluated the associations after adjustment for critical confounding factors. Our findings are validated by sensitivity analysis.

There were also some limitations in our study. First, the causal link associations could not be obtained on account of the cross-sectional design of the NHANES dataset. Second, the data on renal stones were collected by interview, which might cause recall bias in self-reported data. A large number of participants with incomplete data or asymptomatic urolithiasis were missed. Third, the limited data in the bowel health questionnaire made it difficult to collect more information for bowel health, including abdominal pain and drug application history. Fourth, we could only assess the bowel health status by questionnaire. Chronic bowel diseases are best assessed by using the Rome criteria. Hence, the definition of “chronicity” might be ubiquitous. The duration of the most common stool type was not recorded in the NHANES dataset. Fifth, there were still some unaccounted or unobserved covariates that should be included. Finally, although we conducted a multiple imputation sensitivity analysis, there were still unpredictable biases that influence the findings of our study.


Conclusions

This cross-sectional study indicated that chronic diarrhea is associated with an overall risk of renal stones, especially in participants with BMI of 25–30 kg/m2 in the US adult population. Chronic constipation is positively related to the risk of renal stones in individuals with BMI over 30 kg/m2. Public health awareness should be aroused to focus on sustaining bowel health status. These findings should be confirmed by further prospective cohort studies with larger sample size in the future.


Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thanks to Zhang Jing (Shanghai Tongren Hospital) for his work on the NHANES database. His work on the nhanesR package and webpage, made it easier to explore the NHANES database.

Funding: This work was supported by the Project of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (Grant No. 2023YFS0029) and National Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. GZC20231800).


Footnote

Reporting Checklist: The authors have completed the STROBE reporting checklist. Available at https://tau.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tau-24-212/rc

Peer Review File: Available at https://tau.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tau-24-212/prf

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tau.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tau-24-212/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). The research was performed using de-identified data from the publicly National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey dataset. The ethical review board of the National Center for Health Statistics granted approval to the NHANES protocols. Written informed consent was acquired by the NHANES for participating in the survey.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Ye C, Zhao L, Miao J, et al. Porous Se@SiO(2) nanocomposites play a potential inhibition role in hyperoxaluria associated kidney stone by exerting antioxidant effects. Transl Androl Urol 2024;13:526-36. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Mao X, Yang Y, Yang J, et al. Association between body roundness index and prevalence of kidney stone in the U.S: a study based on the NHANES database. BMC Urol 2024;24:93. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Zisman AL. Effectiveness of Treatment Modalities on Kidney Stone Recurrence. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2017;12:1699-708. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Siener R. Nutrition and Kidney Stone Disease. Nutrients 2021;13:1917. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Kogut MH, Lee A, Santin E. Microbiome and pathogen interaction with the immune system. Poult Sci 2020;99:1906-13. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Knauf F, Brewer JR, Flavell RA. Immunity, microbiota and kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol 2019;15:263-74. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Sommers T, Mitsuhashi S, Singh P, et al. Prevalence of Chronic Constipation and Chronic Diarrhea in Diabetic Individuals in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol 2019;114:135-42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Markland AD, Palsson O, Goode PS, et al. Association of low dietary intake of fiber and liquids with constipation: evidence from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Gastroenterol 2013;108:796-803. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Ballou S, Katon J, Singh P, et al. Chronic Diarrhea and Constipation Are More Common in Depressed Individuals. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;17:2696-703. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, et al. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol 2012;62:160-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Lee JA, Johns TS, Melamed ML, et al. Associations between Socioeconomic Status and Urge Urinary Incontinence: An Analysis of NHANES 2005 to 2016. J Urol 2020;203:379-84. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Mao W, Hu Q, Chen S, et al. Polyfluoroalkyl chemicals and the risk of kidney stones in US adults: A population-based study. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2021;208:111497. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022. Diabetes Care 2022;45:S125-S143. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Su YS, Gelman A, Hill J, et al. Multiple Imputation with Diagnostics (mi) in R: Opening Windows into the Black Box. Journal of Statistical Software 2011;45:1-31. [Crossref]
  15. Davies MJ, Aroda VR, Collins BS, et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2022. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia 2022;65:1925-66. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Robertson WG. Renal stones in the tropics. Semin Nephrol 2003;23:77-87. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Krambeck AE, Lieske JC, Li X, et al. Effect of age on the clinical presentation of incident symptomatic urolithiasis in the general population. J Urol 2013;189:158-64. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Ciacci C, Spagnuolo G, Tortora R, et al. Urinary stone disease in adults with celiac disease: prevalence, incidence and urinary determinants. J Urol 2008;180:974-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  19. Starcea IM, Miron I, Lupu A, et al. Unraveling chronic kidney disease in children: a surprising manifestation of celiac disease. Front Pediatr 2024;12:1384591. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  20. Pak CY, Sakhaee K, Moe OW, et al. Defining hypercalciuria in nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int 2011;80:777-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  21. Zhang H, Huang Y, Zhang J, et al. Causal effects of inflammatory bowel diseases on the risk of kidney stone disease: a two-sample bidirectional mendelian randomization. BMC Urol 2023;23:162. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  22. Dimke H, Winther-Jensen M, Allin KH, et al. Risk of Urolithiasis in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Nationwide Danish Cohort Study 1977-2018. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;19:2532-2540.e2. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  23. Lee JA, Stern JM. Understanding the Link Between Gut Microbiome and Urinary Stone Disease. Curr Urol Rep 2019;20:19. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  24. Miller AW, Penniston KL, Fitzpatrick K, et al. Mechanisms of the intestinal and urinary microbiome in kidney stone disease. Nat Rev Urol 2022;19:695-707. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  25. Ticinesi A, Nouvenne A, Chiussi G, et al. Calcium Oxalate Nephrolithiasis and Gut Microbiota: Not just a Gut-Kidney Axis. A Nutritional Perspective. Nutrients 2020;12:548. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  26. Xu ZJ, Chen L, Tang QL, et al. Differential oral and gut microbial structure related to systemic metabolism in kidney stone patients. World J Urol 2024;42:6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  27. Choy WH, Adler A, Morgan-Lang C, et al. Deficient butyrate metabolism in the intestinal microbiome is a potential risk factor for recurrent kidney stone disease. Urolithiasis 2024;52:38. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  28. Mehra Y, Rajesh NG, Viswanathan P. Analysis and Characterization of Lactobacillus paragasseri and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei: Two Probiotic Bacteria that Can Degrade Intestinal Oxalate in Hyperoxaluric Rats. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2022;14:854-72. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  29. Tavasoli S, Alebouyeh M, Naji M, et al. Association of intestinal oxalate-degrading bacteria with recurrent calcium kidney stone formation and hyperoxaluria: a case-control study. BJU Int 2020;125:133-43. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  30. Wang M, Jian Z, Ma Y, et al. Depression increases the risk of kidney stone: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2018 and Mendelian randomization analysis. J Affect Disord 2022;312:17-21. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  31. Liska D, Mah E, Brisbois T, et al. Narrative Review of Hydration and Selected Health Outcomes in the General Population. Nutrients 2019;11:70. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  32. Bianco J, Chu F, Bergsland K, et al. What treatments reduce kidney stone risk in patients with bowel disease? Urolithiasis 2022;50:557-65. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  33. Chey WD, Kurlander J, Eswaran S. Irritable bowel syndrome: a clinical review. JAMA 2015;313:949-58. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  34. Ye Z, Wu C, Xiong Y, et al. Obesity, metabolic dysfunction, and risk of kidney stone disease: a national cross-sectional study. Aging Male 2023;26:2195932. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  35. Lovegrove CE, Bešević J, Wiberg A, et al. Central Adiposity Increases Risk of Kidney Stone Disease through Effects on Serum Calcium Concentrations. J Am Soc Nephrol 2023;34:1991-2011. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  36. Wan Y, Zhang D, Xing T, et al. The impact of visceral obesity on chronic constipation, inflammation, immune function and cognitive function in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Aging (Albany NY) 2021;13:6702-11. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  37. Misra S, Lee A, Gensel K. Chronic constipation in overweight children. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2006;30:81-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Shen S, Di X, Xiang L, Li H, Liao B. Association of chronic constipation and chronic diarrhea with renal stones: a cross-sectional study of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2010. Transl Androl Urol 2024;13(9):2036-2044. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-212

Download Citation