Erratum: Infection following inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a real-world comparison of device selection and patient characteristics
Erratum

Erratum: Infection following inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a real-world comparison of device selection and patient characteristics

Editorial Office

Translational Andrology and Urology

Correspondence to: Editorial Office. Translational Andrology and Urology. Email: tau@amepc.org.

Submitted Aug 11, 2026. Accepted for publication Aug 20, 2026. Published online Sep 23, 2026.

doi: 10.21037/tau-20262-07


Erratum to: Transl Androl Urol 2025;14:2635-43.

In the published article entitled “Infection following inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a real-world comparison of device selection and patient characteristics” (1), the authors identified an error in the Abstract. Specifically, the P value reported for the comparison of infection rates between AMS 700 and Titan devices reflected the P value from the unadjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis rather than the P values from the time-to-event analysis.

The error appears in the Results section of the Abstract.

Original text:

Infection rates were 1.8% (AMS 700) vs. 2.9% (Titan) at 180 days post-IPP and 2.5% (AMS 700) vs. 3.3% (Titan) at a median follow-up of 3 years (P=0.047).

Corrected text:

Infection rates were 1.8% (AMS 700) vs. 2.9% (Titan) at 180 days post-IPP (P=0.001) and 2.5% (AMS 700) vs. 3.3% (Titan) at a median follow-up of 3 years (P=0.01).

The corrected P values correspond to the time-to-event analysis reported in the study. The unadjusted Cox proportional hazards regression result reported in the main manuscript remains unchanged: hazard ratio (HR) 0.74 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56–0.996; P=0.047]. The adjusted Cox regression result also remains unchanged: HR 0.67 (95% CI: 0.48–0.93; P=0.02). The P value reported for the comparison at a median follow-up of 3 years is 0.012, and truncated per journal’s Guidelines for Authors to 2 decimal places.

This correction does not affect the study findings, interpretation, or conclusions. The authors regret this error.

Click here to view the updated version of the article.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Nguyen V, Sato R, Rojanasarot S, et al. Infection following inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a real-world comparison of device selection and patient characteristics. Transl Androl Urol 2025;14:2635-43. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Editorial Office. Erratum: Infection following inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a real-world comparison of device selection and patient characteristics. Transl Androl Urol 2026;15(9):353. doi: 10.21037/tau-20262-07

Download Citation