AB076. Compare the treatment of urolithiasis in a microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy pneumatic lithotripsy and open surgery

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the treatment of urolithiasis in a microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy ultrasonic pneumatic lithotripsy and open stone surgery.

Methods: January 2014–October 2014 in our hospital treated 43 cases of patients with kidney stones as the observation group, the use of micro-channel percutaneous nephrolithotomy lithotripsy; and 48 cases of patients with urolithiasis in March 2013~December 2013 were treated as the control group, the use of open stone surgery treatment.

Results: It was observed in patients with clinical manifestations and complications during surgery, after statistical comparison of the results were analyzed. Observation group and control group operative time was no difference (P>0.05), hospitalization time in the observation group was shorter than the control group (P<0.05). Bleeding volume in the observation group was less than the control group (P<0.05). A clearance rate in the observation group was higher than the control group (P<0.05), the incidence of complications in the observation group was less than the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion: The difference was statistically significant. Significant effect of microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy is smaller surgical trauma and shorter hospital stay.

Keywords: Urolithiasis; open stone surgery; microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy