Editorial
A comprehensive review of contemporary reconstructive urology
Translational Andrology and Urology
2020;
9
(1)
:1-2
.
(01 February 2020)
Original Article
Balloon dilation performs poorly as a salvage management strategy for recurrent bulbar urethral strictures following failed urethroplasty
Translational Andrology and Urology
2020;
9
(1)
:3-9
.
(01 February 2020)
Age ≤40 is an independent predictor of anastomotic urethroplasty and successful repair of bulbar urethral strictures
Translational Andrology and Urology
2020;
9
(1)
:10-15
.
(01 February 2020)
Outpatient buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty outcomes are comparable to inpatient procedures
Translational Andrology and Urology
2020;
9
(1)
:16-22
.
(01 February 2020)
Enhanced ambulatory male urethral surgery: a pathway to successful outpatient urethroplasty
Translational Andrology and Urology
2020;
9
(1)
:23-30
.
(01 February 2020)
Worldwide trends in penile implantation surgery: data from over 63,000 implants
Translational Andrology and Urology
2020;
9
(1)
:31-37
.
(01 February 2020)
Long-term sequelae of inflatable penile prosthesis: clinical characteristics of patients who develop distal cylinder tip extrusion
Translational Andrology and Urology
2020;
9
(1)
:38-42
.
(01 February 2020)
An update on oxidized regenerated cellulose (fibrillar™) in reducing postoperative corporal bleeding following inflatable penile prosthesis surgery
Translational Andrology and Urology
2020;
9
(1)
:43-49
.
(01 February 2020)
Urethral atrophy is now a rare cause for artificial urinary sphincter revision surgery in the contemporary 3.5 cm cuff era
Translational Andrology and Urology
2020;
9
(1)
:50-55
.
(01 February 2020)
Long-term device survival and quality of life outcomes following artificial urinary sphincter placement
Translational Andrology and Urology
2020;
9
(1)
:56-61
.
(01 February 2020)
Comparison of 3.5 cm and transcorporal cuffs in high-risk artificial urinary sphincter populations
Translational Andrology and Urology
2020;
9
(1)
:62-66
.
(01 February 2020)
The impact of prior external beam radiation therapy on device outcomes following artificial urinary sphincter revision surgery
Translational Andrology and Urology
2020;
9
(1)
:67-72
.
(01 February 2020)
Reinforcing vasal suture technique improves sperm concentration and pregnancy rates in men undergoing vasovasostomy for vasectomy reversal
Translational Andrology and Urology
2020;
9
(1)
:73-81
.
(01 February 2020)
Preventing the need for revision surgery after penile plication reconstruction of Peyronie’s deformities
Translational Andrology and Urology
2020;
9
(1)
:82-86
.
(01 February 2020)
Dutasteride in the long-term management of stuttering priapism
Translational Andrology and Urology
2020;
9
(1)
:87-92
.
(01 February 2020)
Review Article
A primer on extramammary Paget’s disease for the urologist
Translational Andrology and Urology
2020;
9
(1)
:93-105
.
(01 February 2020)
Original Article
Pelvic fracture urethral injuries associated with rectal injury: a review of acute and definitive urologic and bowel management with long term outcomes
Translational Andrology and Urology
2020;
9
(1)
:106-114
.
(01 February 2020)
Brief Report
Treatment outcomes of bladder neck contractures from surgical clip erosion: a matched cohort comparison
Translational Andrology and Urology
2020;
9
(1)
:115-120
.
(01 February 2020)
Surgical Technique
Robotic urethral reconstruction: redefining the paradigm of posterior urethroplasty
Translational Andrology and Urology
2020;
9
(1)
:121-131
.
(01 February 2020)
Original Article
Neurogenic bladder: management of the severely impaired patient with complete urethral destruction: ileovesicostomy, suprapubic tube drainage or urinary diversion—is one treatment modality better than another?
Translational Andrology and Urology
2020;
9
(1)
:132-141
.
(01 February 2020)
Persistent, long-term risk for ureteroenteric anastomotic stricture formation: the case for long term follow-up
Translational Andrology and Urology
2020;
9
(1)
:142-150
.
(01 February 2020)
Disclosure:
The focused issue “Current Topics of Reconstructive Urologic Surgery” was commissioned by the editorial office, Translational Andrology and Urology without any sponsorship or funding. Boyd R. Viers and Allen F. Morey served as the unpaid Guest Editors for the focused issue.
